Wednesday, September 18, 2019

A Complete List of Astronomy and Space Themed Cars

List of cars named after things in astronomy and space


For Americans, the car is a part of culture itself in that, more so than any other personal possession, the car has truly shaped how we live, work, and play.

In a way, 20th century America can be broken down into BF/AF, as in Before/After Ford. While the assembly line and standardized parts concepts had been around for decades, Henry Ford was the first automaker in the world to apply it to the production of cars. Before Ford, cars were expensive, hand-built playthings of the rich. After Ford, the car was a mass-produced commodity that, with some saving, could be afforded by most Americans. Seeing what Ford was doing, the other major American automakers were quick to copy and car sales skyrocketed.

Before the car, there were essentially two ways of life for Americans: farming in the country or factory work in crowded, often filthy cities. The pace of life was dictated by the speed and stamina of your horse or your own two feet. It was during the 1920s and the economic boom that made this decade 'the Roaring 20s' that the American landscape began to change. People with modest money bought cars and many moved to the outskirts of the big cities, giving birth to suburbia, which was a blend of city/country life that made many people happy. Clean and with enough room to roam and no hard work of the farm but close enough to city markets to supply one's needs and wants. What made this all possible? The car.

Following WWII, the growth of suburbia took off as Americans reveled in previously unimagined prosperity as we literally rebuilt the world following WWII and reaped the benefits in the form of plentiful, good-paying jobs. Life without a car for suburbanites? Impossible!

At the same time, America began to go space-crazy. The German V2 rockets of WWII were the first ballistic missiles and, for a short time, they entered space. Scientists knew that, with bigger rockets, it would be possible to launch payloads into orbit. Military planners on both sides of the Cold War saw space as a key battleground in that whoever controlled space first was at a decided advantage should war come. Space became all the rage going into the late 1950s and especially into the 1960s as President Kennedy famously declared that Americans would go to the Moon and safely return to Earth by decade's end. Space became a pop cultural phenomenon, appearing prominently in movies, TV, music, radio, books, art and design, toys, and last but not least, cars. It is no coincidence that most of the cars detailed below were initially launched in the heat of the Space Race.



So here we go, a complete (as I can think of) list of all the astromomy/space-themed American cars.



Buick

Apollo (1973-76)

When the American demand for fuel to fulfill its thirst for its large, powerful vehicles ran head-onto into the energy shortages of the early 1970s, manufacturers were sent scrambling to quickly come up with smaller, more fuel efficient cars. Named after the Greek sky god and lunar missions that landed on the Moon, the Apollo was Buick's first effort in the compact market. The modest 250ci I6 engine certainly was fuel efficient and came paired with either a 3-speed automatic or manual transmission. For those still wanting some get up and go under the hood, the Apollo offered a 350ci V8 as an option. The car could be had as a 2 door coupe, 2 door hatchback, or 4 door sedan. The Apollo was rebadged as the Skylark for 1976 and is largely forgotten today







Chevrolet
Vega (1970-77)

Even before the energy crisis hit in the early 70s, there was a market for subcompact cars in the United States as evidenced by the success of the Volkswagen Beetle. Wanting to cash in on this market and improve on its disastrous Corvair, General Motors launched a program in the mid 60s to design a conventional subcompact (front engine, rear wheel drive) that would compete head on with the popular German import. The Vega beat out proposals by Pontiac and others within Chevrolet that focused on low weight and high fuel economy. The Vega was green-lighted in 1968 and, upon release in 1970, was much lauded, even winning Motor Trend's coveted Car of the Year Award in 1971.

That was about as good as it got.

Despite its initial good impressions, the Vega soon became known as a lemon. The car quickly gained a reputation for bad engineering, tendency to rust, poor safety, and reliability. The engine was especially troublesome. Poorly designed, oil would often seep into the combustion chambers, producing clouds of blue smoke. A popular joke of the period stated that the only time that you would see a Vega going down the road not blowing smoke was when it was on the back of a wrecker. Throughout its run, the car's reputation was tarnished by several recalls and it became an embarrassment for General Motors. Fortunately for GM, the Vega's competition was another quickly cobbled together 70s beauty: the Ford Pinto. Probably for that reason alone, the Vega soldiered and smoked on through the 1977 model year.

Today, the car is remembered not for its breaking new ground, but its practical problems.

Facts and Figures
*Styles: 2 door notchback, 2 door hatchback, 2 door station wagon, 2 door sedan delivery

*Engine: 122ci I4, 140 ci I4

*Transmission: 3, 4, and 5 speed manual, 2 and 3 speed auto

*Dimensions: 169” l, 65” w, 51” h

*Weight: 2181-2270 lbs

*Production: 2,006,661



Nova (1962-79, 85-88)
A far brighter chapter in Chevy's astro car efforts was the Nova. Like the Vega, the Nova was born of of a desire to capture the compact market. Unlike the Vega, though, the Nova was born out of a troubled economy. The United States slipped into a recession in the late 50s and the huge gas guzzlers of that era lost appeal as car buyers looked to economize on fuel. Ford launched its compact Falcon in 1960. Chevy countered with its quirky Corvair, which copied the rear engine design of the just beginning to be noticed in America Beetle. Result: the Falcon soared while the Corvair gained a reputation of being both poorly built and dangerous, taking up a large part of Ralph Nader's
Unsafe At Any Speed. Sensing their mistake, Chevy quickly launched a program to design a conventional compact (front engine, rear wheel drive) that would compete head on with the popular Ford Falcon.

First Generation (1962-65)
The Nova name first appeared as the top trim package on the compact Chevy II. In the naming phase, 'Nova' was one of the finalists but lost to Chevy II because the manufacturer wanted a name that started with a 'C.' All cars in the first 2 years stayed true to the desire for economy, coming equipped with either I4 or I6 engines, with the 283ci V8 first arriving for 1964 as a performance option at the dawn of the muscle car era. 1965 saw a mild sheet metal redesign and the 327ci V8, capable of producing 300hp. Even with a new emphasis on performance, sales still trailed the Falcon dramatically.

Second Generation (1966-67)
Going into its second incarnation that saw a much more substantial restyle that that of 1964 vs. 1965, 'Nova' was still a trim package on the Chevy II. For 1966, the emphasis came increasingly on performance as the 327 V8 was even more highly
tuned, with power now rated at 350hp. At the same time, the I4 was now only offered on the base Chevy II. 1967 saw only minor tweaks and new government-mandated safety features but the new, mid-size, openly performance-focused Camaro cannibalized Nova sales.
Third Generation (1968-74)

1968 saw another dramatic restyle and an accompanying increase in
size, with the Nova now nearly equaling the mid-size Chevelle. For 1969, 'Chevy II' was dropped and the Nova finally became a model in its own right. If one counts the 'Nova' years of the Chevy II, the Nova was the longest continually produced astro themed car on this list. In addition to becoming a nameplate in its own right, 1969 saw the addition of the 396ci V8, rated at 375hp, to the engine lineup. 1970-71 saw little changes and the I4 was dropped as the new economy car slot was now occupied by the Vega. 1972 saw the engine detuned because of government pollution regulations, which effectively ended the reign of the muscle car. 1974 featured a short-lived seat belt interlock feature that would not allow the car to start unless the belt was buckled. The public loudly complained and the feature was quickly dropped.
Fourth Generation (1975-79)

1975 brought a major redesign, downsize, and a return of the
I4 engine as the energy crisis persisted and as the Vega had quickly acquired the reputation of being a lemon. The LN (Luxury Nova) package was introduced for 1975 and was designed to rival European luxury compacts as American manufacturers, struggling to meet emission and fuel economy standards, looked for a new niche in which to market their products. The biggest engine offered was a 350ci V8, detuned to a paltry 165hp, less than half of what it was just a few years before. There were few changes from year to year with the Nova, but the same could not be said for other GM products. With the GM downsizing of 1977-8, the 'compact' Nova was now essentially midsize. Chevy canned the Nova after 1979 as the newly downsized, more modern-looking Malibu far outsold it
Fifth Generation (1985-88)

An unusual (and best forgotten) chapter in Chevrolet's history was a brief resurrection of the Nova for the 1985-88 model years. Designed
as a subcompact joint venture between GM and Toyota, the resurrected Nova was essentially a badge-engineered Toyota Corolla. Unlike its predecessors, the car was now front wheel drive. Changes during the years were minor and the cars were only offered with I4 engines that topped out at 110hp. Chevy mercifully dropped the now-sullied Nova name for 1989 and essentially rebranded it as the Geo Prizim.

Sometimes memories of glories past should be left at just that.

Facts and figures
*
Styles: 2 and 4 door sedan, 2 door hardtop, 2 door convertible, 3 and 5 door hatchback, 4 door wagon

* Engines: 97-153ci I4, 194-250ci I6, 283-402ci V8s. Top performer: 402 ci V8 at 375hp

* Transmissions: 2, 3, and 4 speed automatics, 3, 4, and 5 speed manuals

* Production: peaked in 1974 at 390,517


Equinox (2005-present)
A current Chevy offering i
ntroduced in 2005 as a midsize SUV, the Equinox came about as the domestic vehicle market was undergoing a change as customers became increasingly interested in 4-door trucks, SUVs, and crossovers instead of cars. The equinox came with front wheel drive as standard with all wheel drive optional. Unlike the Trailblazer or Tahoe, the Equinox was lightly built and not designed for off-roading. With the return of the Blazer for 2018, the Equinox was downsized to a compact SUV. Engines are I4 (some turbocharged) or V6 and all transmissions are automatic.Dodge
Aries (1981-89)

Unlike ford and GM, which reacted swiftly to the energy shortages of the 1970s, Chrysler was financially-strapped at the time and, as a result, was nowhere near as nimble. Narrowly avoiding bankruptcy, Chrysler was late to the game with adapting to the changing times. The Aries (with the Plymouth Reliant) replaced
the Plymouth Volare and Dodge Aspen. Chrysler marketed both as being the smallest American cars with a 6 passenger capacity. Initial sales were brisk, but soon thereafter slowed to around 100,000 cars/year through the remainder of the production run, which concluded after the 1989 model year.

Facts and Figures
*
Styles: 4 door sedan, 4 door wagon, 2 door coupe

* Engine: 135 ci I4, 158 ci I4

* Transmission: 4 and 5 speed manual, 3 speed auto

* Dimensions: 178” l, 68” w, 52” h

* Weight: 2300 lbs

* Production: 978,460



Ford
Skyliner (1957-59)

While largely unknown to the general public today, the Ford Skyliner is perhaps the coolest car ever produced for one reason alone: it was a hardtop convertible. Despite being branded as the Fairlane Skyliner for 1957-8
and the Galaxie Skyliner for 1959, the cars were essentially the same. All cars vame with V8s ranging from 272-352ci. Transmission choices were all 3-speed with one automatics and two manuals, one of which sported another innovative feature: an overdrive gear. Despite being very showy and innovative, sales were disappointing at just 48,394 cars over 3 years, with 1957 marking the peak in production at over 20,000 cars sold. By the end of the production run just two years later, not even 13,000 Skyliners found buyers. High cost (for a Ford) and limited storage space in the trunk with top down (thanks to the fact that metal can't fold like canvas) undoubtedly contributed to the lack of popularity at the time. Showing that greatness is not always appreciated in its own time, the Skyliner is highly collectible today.

Galaxie (1959-74)
Ford's full-size offering during its entire production run, the Ford Galaxie is the longest continually produced astro-themed nameplate in its own right (discounting the 'Nova' badge years of the Chevy II) on this list. It is also perhaps the most variable in options as a Galaxie could be had as anything from a stereotypical grandparents' car to a raceway terror and anything in between. The first generation of the Galaxie (1959) is effectively summarized under the Skyliner above. Technically, the Skyliner was a Galaxie trim package as standard Galaxies followed more conventional designs (fixed metal top or soft top convertible).
Second Generation (1960-64)
The Galaxie (and Ford's entire lineup) got a dramatic facelift for 1960. Sheet metal was greatly simplified compared with the 1959 and gone was the wrap-around windshield, common on American cars from the mid to late 1950s. For its first two years (1960 and '61), the Galaxie had two more sky/star-themed trim packages: the Starliner, a fastback
hardtop (no central pillar) equipped with the new 390 ci V8, rated at 401 hp. Convertibles known as 'Galaxie Sunliners.' 1962 saw the “500” (for the big NASCAR races) added to the name to emphasize performance, which was now what Ford was promoting. 1962 also saw Ford break the 400ci barrier with its new 406 V8, which added a few ponies to the 401 of the 390ci V8 already in use. The 406 came partnered with a 4-speed manual transmission. Mid year 1963 (branded 1963 ½-an industry first designation of a model as a half year) saw the fastback return and the introduction of the 427 ci V8 (essentially a more deeply bored 406) rated at 425 hp straight off the sales floor. Under the sheet metal, which now featured deeply sculpted sides and grille, the 1964 offerings were mechanically equal in every way.

Third Generation (1965-68)
1965 saw a redesign in both body and chassis. The Galaxie now got stacked quad headlights and slab sides. Underneath, the suspension was updated with coil springs replacing the rear leaf springs.
Top-tier, especially plush models were called the Galaxie LTD. As for engines and transmissions, offerings remained largely the same, with the 427 retaining flagship position. 1966 saw the Galaxie and 'LTD' become separate models and Ford introduced its new 428 ci V8 that was only rated at 345hp, 80 less than its predecessor, the 427. The reason: cost. The large bore of the 427 made it expensive to produce as the slightest shift during casting could make the entire block unusable. The high compression of the 427 (11.6:1) also required thicker castings. While the 428 was not as potent as the 427, the emphasis on performance was shifting to mid-size models, which meant that the 428 didn't need to move as much weight as the 427s, which had to propel full-size cars at the same blazing fast speeds. 1967 and 1968 saw only minor changes, often dictated by new government safety standards. The biggest changes in this time span was the more rounded look that arrived for 1967 and when the Galaxie switched back to more conventional horizontally mounted headlights in 1968, which had not been seen since 1964.

 Fourth Generation (1969-74)
1969 saw yet another new platform, with the Galaxie adding a few inches to its wheelbase. Also arriving in 1969 was the new 429 ci V8, rated at 360 hp, and government mandated headrests for the front seats. Sheet metal remained similar in look to the 1968 model. Another vestige of the muscle Galaxie was dropped in 1970, when the 4 speed manual transmission previously offered (but by no means standard, anymore) with the 429 was dropped. 1970 also saw the ignition move from the dash to the steering column. 1971 saw new sheet metal and a new grille featuring a prominent center section reminiscent of many contemporary Pontiacs. Underneath, the cars remained unchanged. 1971 would also mark the end of the big horsepower as new government regulations over emissions and fuel standards were forced upon Ford and all of Detroit. 1971 was also the final year Ford offered its 3-speed manual transmission with a column shift (three on the tree) with its V8 engines. Restricted to the I6 engines for 1972, the three on the tree tranny would be dropped altogether for 1973. 1973-74 Galaxies were essentially unchanged and the name was dropped for 1975, with Ford consolidating its full-size models under the LTD nameplate. Facts and Figures
*
Styles: 2 and 4 door sedans, 2 and 4 door hardtops, 2 door convertible, 2 door convertible

* Engine: 223-300ci I6s, V8s ranging from 272-429ci, the 427 with dual 4 barrel carburetors was the most powerful at 425hp

* Transmission: 2 and 3 speed auto, 3 and 4 speed manual

* Production: 6,543,138 with a peak of 648,010 in 1963, that's over 40,000 more than the Mustang's peak yearGalaxies in NASCAR
Many NASCAR teams ran Galaxies through the 1966 season (the era of the biggest cars getting the biggest engines) when Ford switched to the smaller, lighter Fairlane going into 1967. Highlights include:

* 1961 and 65 championships with Ned Jarrett

* 1963, 65 Daytona 500

* 1961-63, 65 Southern 500s

* 1961, 62, 65 World 600s

* In 1963, Fred Lorenzen is first to top $100,000 in season earnings

The Yellow Banana Galaxie
In astronomy, galaxies are commonly known by illustrative names that describe their appearance, such as the Sombrero, Whirlpool, Pinwheel, etc. In 1966, the racing world would be graced, albeit once, by a uniquely nicknamed Ford Galaxie, dubbed 'the Yellow Banana' by a local sports reporter.

The Yellow Banana Galaxie of 1966 has its roots in 1964, which is when Chrysler launched its potent 426ci Hemi V8 and went on to dominate at the big tracks (and thus the most prestigious races).
Ford had no answer and was clobbered by Chrysler products for the 1964 NASCAR season. Going into 1965 and citing driver safety (4 drivers died in 1964), specifically tire failure at high speed, Ford lobbyists convinced NASCAR to ban the Hemi. Result: Chrysler teams boycotted for 1965 and race attendance plummeted as many star drivers (most notably Richard Petty and David Pearson) were absent from the fields. Race attendance and revenues tumbling, NASCAR let the Hemi return late in the 1965 season.

Ford again wasn't happy and this time, they designed a tricked out version of the 427 that featured a single overhead cam (SOHC) and hemispherical cylinder heads-essentially copying the Chrysler Hemi (stands for hemispherical) design. Additionally, the new engine featured an idler (rather than a cam) shaft in the block, dual point ignition, and oversize valves. With a single 4 barrel carburetor, the engine was rated at 616hp. A pair of 4 barrels? A screaming 657hp. Ford sold the engine via the parts department and the racing world braced itself for a Ford SOHC vs. Chrysler Hemi war in 1966.

However, that wasn't to be. Chrysler protested, probably due to the fact that, while Ford produced enough engines to qualify for competition, they weren't in any cars that hit the sales floor for purchase by the general public. Result: Ford's 427 SOHC became the only 'production' engine ever banned by NASCAR and, as a result, the factory Ford teams sat out the 1966 season as Chrysler had done the year before. Seeing the writing on the wall for more lost attendance and desperate to get Ford back into the sport to prevent another financially bleak year, NASCAR became very selective in its enforcement of rules governing the 'stockness' of its stock cars, which led to the Yellow Banana.

For the 1966 Dixie 400 at Atlanta, Junior
Johnson, now retired as a driver, built Fred Lorenzen a decidedly non-stock Galaxie that featured a front end that was sloped down (and barely avoided scraping the pavement) for aerodynamics and a back end that was swept up at a decidedly non-stock angle for maximum rear downforce, and thus better handling in the turns. On top of that, the roof was chopped and slanted so much that Lorenzen had to be picked up and lowered into the car through where the rear window would have been. The only thing more audacious than the fact that a team showed up to a 'stock' car race with a car this obviously non-stock was the fact that NASCAR let it race! If that weren't enough, Smokey Yunick, already long-known for, in his own words, 'creative engineering,' showed up with a one of its kind Chevelle for the same race. While it looked perfectly normal in shape, Yunick's Chevelle was built to 7/8th scale of the production version. On top of that, it had an oversized engine, yet NASCAR allowed it to race, too.

As for the Yellow Banana, Lorenzen blew a tire while leading and wrecked it, which means that there are virtually no good photos of the actual car. The car seen here is actually a picture of a model taken from Lorenzen's website, which, apparently approved by Lorenzen himself, is probably as good a visual of the 'Yellow Banana' as we will ever see.

Taurus (1986-2007, 2010-19)
The 1970s and the s tart of the 80s weren't exactly banner years for the American auto industry. Continually burdened with ever more regulations in regards to emissions and fuel economy, automakers were devoting all their engineering abilities to meet these new government mandates. Result: style and performance suffered and, by the middle 80s, many cars still looked similar to (albeit downsized) their 70s counterparts. However, the tide was starting to turn and automakers, now getting their hands around the government's killjoy rules, could finally start looking toward styling again. Ford was no exception, as the mid-size LTD II was looking quite dated compared to the competition. That all changed in 1986 when Ford introduced the futuristic-looking Taurus. The Taurus w
as Ford's first front wheel drive car (last of the “Big Three” to launch one) and was designed to compete directly with more modern Japanese imports, which were really eating Detroit's lunch when it came to customers looking for economy models. The car was a hit as over 200,000 were sold the first year. By 1991 and the end of the first generation, over 2,000,000 were sold and the car single handedly pushed Ford to #1 car maker status (though they had held this position with trucks since the mid 70s).

Taking the cue to not fix what wasn't broken, the 1992-95 Taurus received new sheetmetal but the car retained the basic look, albeit more smoothed over for better aerodynamics. 1996 saw the car's first (and really only) major redesign and mixed reaction from the public. Still, the car sold well but 1996 also marked the final year for the Taurus as America's top-selling car. The manual transmission was also dropped for 1996. In 1998, the Taurus replaced the Thunderbird as Ford's NASCAR model and would remain so for the better part of a decade, winning the national championship in 1999 (Dale Jarrett), 2003 (Matt Kenseth), and 2004 (Kurt Busch) along with dozens of races.The 2000-2007 generation was a mild update of the previous generation and eliminated the controversial emphasis on ovals (especially in regards to the rear window) that characterized the 1996-99 generation. Overall, though, the car retained the basic look and continued to sell well to the tune of roughly 250,000 per year at worst through 2004. Unfortunately for the Taurus, the market started to change come the mid 2000s as consumers became increasingly interested in 4-door trucks, SUVs, and crossovers to the detriment of the traditional car. By 2006, citing plummeting sales (most USA sales were restricted to fleets by now), Ford canned the Taurus to much public outcry.

Result of the fuss: Ford resurrected the Taurus as a full-size model in 2008 and positioned it as a successor to the Crown Victoria, itself on an already-mapped road to cancellation thanks to, you guessed it, more government fuel economy standards. This new Taurus, like the old, initially came as front wheel drive (in contrast to the rear drive of the Crown Victoria) but was later offered with an 4 wheel drive option. Unfortunately, concurrent with the new Taurus, Dodge launched its 707hp V8 Hellcat engine and dropped it into the new 4-door Charger. In comparison, the Taurus' 365hp turbocharged V6 looked more than tame and the car never had a chance with a resurgence of power-hungry customers. In fact, the new Taurus never really took off at all, period. In its best year (2013), a paltry 69,063 found buyers, which was not even 1,000 better than the old mid-size version's worst (and last) year. Adding insult to injury, the old Taurus' last year of 2007 was not even a full year's production. In spring, 2018, Ford killed the new Taurus (in the USA), too, citing increasing demand for trucks, SUVs, and crossovers. As of now, sales continue overseas.

Facts and Figures

*
Styles: Four door sedan, wagon

* Engines: 152ci I6, 183-231ci V6

* Transmissions: 3, 4, and 6 speed auto, 5 speed manual

* Production: 7,519,919 for the mid-size 1986-2007 (peaked at 463,104 in 1997), 2008-2018 production peaked at 69,063 in 2013 (the worst year for the old Taurus was 68,178 in 2007)


Mercury
Comet (1960-69, 1971-77)

Like its more basic cousin, the Mercury Comet was launched in response to the recession of the late 1950s, which saw people wanting smaller, more fuel efficient cars.
Designed concurrently with Ford's compact Falcon, the Comet was developed to be a mid-grade economy car. Like the competing Chevy II/Nova, starting in the mid 60s, the Comet grew to mid-size and put increased emphasis on performance only to return to its roots in its final form. First Generation (1960-63)
In its first year, the Comet (not yet branded as a Mercury) o
nly offered one engine: a 144ci I6 that produced, at best, 90hp. Transmission choices were a 3-speed column shift manual or a 2-speed automatic. While the car certainly was fuel efficient, many buyers complained about lack of power, which resulted in a slightly more potent 170ci I6. The Comet also got an optional 4-speed manual floor shift transmission in addition to the 3-speed. 1962 was status quo except for one major detail: the Comet was finally branded as a Mercury. Still undoubtedly getting complaints regarding a lack of power, 1963 saw a the 260ci V8 offered as an option, which necessitated a redesign of the chassis although everything else remained basically the same. This first generation of Comet shared much with the Ford Falcon both in and out. The easiest way to distinguish a Comet from a Falcon? The Comet had quad headlights (vs. 2 for the Falcon)

Second Generation (1964-65)
In
1964, the Comet saw a major sheet metal redesign and a much more squared-off look. However, the Ford Falcon received much the same treatment and, again, the easiest way to distinguish between models at a quick glance was by the headlights. Gone for 1964 was the much-maligned 144ci I6 and new for '64 were a 200ci I6 and a 289ci V8, widely regarded as Ford's best small block V8. Also dropped for 1964 were the 2-speed automatic transmission and the 3-speed column shift, with the only choices now being a 3-speed auto or a 4-speed manual on the floor. With the performance wars heating up, 1964 saw Mercury build about 50 lightweight Comets specifically for drag racing. Somehow, engineers managed to cram Ford's monster 427ci V8 with dual 4 bbl carbs into the compact Comet. 1964 also saw the performance package Cyclone, eventually to briefly become a model in its own right, offered for the first time. Aside from some new side sculpting and a switch to stacked headlights, 1965 was largely a repeat of 1964 but saw the 170ci I6 and 260ci V8 dropped as engine options. There were no Comets fitted with 427 V8s in '65

Third Generation (1966-67)
The Comet moved decidedly away from its roots (and its cousin, the Falcon) for 1966 as the car moved from compact to midsize
and was now Mercury's counterpart to the Ford Fairlane. In contrast, the Falcon stayed small. Despite the change in size, the chassis remained virtually unchanged but the mechanical options were decidedly limited when compared to the year before. All Comets shared the 390ci V8 and the only choice was a 2 or 4 barrel carburetor. Buyers could still choose an auto or manual transmission. 1967 was largely a repeat of 1966.

Fourth Generation (1968-69)
For 1968, the Comet was redesigned again to appear more like the rest of the Mercury lineup instead of a Fairlane with Mercury badges. Perhaps sensing customer complaints over lack of engine choice, the engine options were greatly expanded for 1968 and included a new 250ci I6 as well as the 289, 302, 351, and 428ci V8s. Ironically, the 390ci V8, the standard (and only) engine for 1966-67 was dropped from the lineup. The performance package Comet Cyclone, with its fastback design, made a name for itself in NASCAR. 1969 was, like as in the previous generation, a repeat of the previous year with the only exception being the Cyclone adding Ford's new 429ci V8 as an option.

Interestingly, 1970 saw the 'Comet' dropped and the Comet Cyclone became just the Cyclone, hence a 1-year gap wherein there was no official 'Comet.'

Third Generation (1971-77)
Come 1971, Mercury decided to relaunch the Comet as a compact counterpart to Ford's new Maverick, the Falcon having been canceled after the 1970 model year. Like the first generation, there was little to distinguish t he Mercury from the Ford, and this would remain so for the entire remainder of the production run. The Comets were distinguished by grille, headlights, and hood but were otherwise Mercury-branded Fords. Engine choices now topped at the 302ci V8. The only other engine offerings were 170 and 200ci I6s. The 4-speed manual transmission was also gone, with the only choices being a 3-speed auto or manual. The 'Cyclone' was dropped for the 1972 model year. This final run offered very few year-to-year changes as Mercury scrapped plans for a extensive redesign for 1975. The aging Comet was dropped after the 1977 model year in favor of the downsized Zephyr, which was a clone of the more widely-known Ford Fairmont.

Facts and Figures

* Styles: 2 and 4 door sedan, 2 door hardtop and convertible, 2 and 4 door wagons

* Engines: 144ci-250ci I6, 260-429ci V8s

* Transmissions: 2 and 3 speed automatics, 3 and 4 speed manuals

* Valuation: Not thought of as a maker of muscle cars, the Comet Cyclone is surprisingly affordable when compared to Ford's Torino Talladega and Mustangs and commonly sell for under $20,000 in “excellent” condition, a true bargain when compared to many equally-potent contemporaries

Mercury Meteor (1961-63)

Like the Comet, the Meteor was initially marketed without the 'Mercury' nameplate. Meteor was, in fact, a separate brand of cars owned by Ford's Canada Division. In 1960, Ford USA bought the rights to use the Meteor name in the States, with the hope of Meteor replacing the disastrously-received Edsel and maintaining a 4-brand lineup. If successful, the Ford brand family would have looked like this: Ford, Meteor, Mercury, and Lincoln at the top. Clearly, the plan didn't succeed and the Meteor got 'Mercury' branding for 1962

First Generation (1961)
In its first year, the Meteor was a full-sized car replacing the poorly-received Edsel, as envisioned by Ford's top brass. In appearance, the Meteor very closely resembled the Mercury Monterey and was only distinguished by trim and lights. Engines offered included the 223ci I6 as standard with 292, 352, and 390ci V8s as options. Transmissions included a 2 and 3 speed auto and 3 speed manual, which offered an optional overdrive ratio, which was very rare in its day. Unfortunately, the Meteor was poorly received in the States, due in large part to the nearly exact, widely-recognized Monterey nameplate and the popularity of the big Ford, the very popular Galaxie.

Second Generation (1962-63)
The Meteor was now, like the Comet, branded as a 'Mercury' for 1962 and downsized to a midsize car to slot in between the Comet and Monterey. This was a logical move as Mercury had no mid-size model at the time. Like the Comet, which shared much with the Falcon, the Meteor shared much with the mid-size Ford Fairlane. Engines were, along with the car, downsized with a 170ci I6 as standard equipment with 221 and 260ci V8s as options. Transmission choices were increased, with buyers being able to choose between 2 and 3 speed autos and 3 and 4 speed manuals. 1963 was unchanged and this, unfortunately, included disappointing sales and the nameplate was dropped for 1964 and is largely forgotten today.



Oldsmobile
Starfire (1961-66, 1975-80)

Like the Nova, the 'Starfire' didn't begin as a model in its own right, originally appearing as a trim package on another model: the Oldsmobile 98 Series convertibles in 1954-57. The 'Starfire' name was dropped for 1958 but would return as its own model for 1961 but now based on the '88' Series. Though, while based on another model, the Starfire would be decidedly unique and always had its own unique trim and an especially luxurious interior. In fact, for much of its run, the Starfire was the most expensive model in the Oldsmobile lineup. Additionally, the Starfire was the first US car to feature a floor-mounted automatic transmission and front bucket seats as standard equipment. Try finding a current car without this setup today-it won't be easy!

First Generation (1961-66)
For its 1961 launch as a model in its own right, the Starfire was only available as a convertible and came equipped with Oldsmobile's most powerful engine, a 394ci V8, rated at 330hp. From the start, the Starfire was the most expensive Oldsmobile. Seeking to broaden its flagship model's appeal, 1962 saw the addition of a 2 door hardtop but 1963 and 64 only got minor changes in the form of sheet metal and trim tweaks. 1965 saw a major restyle featuring a much curvier body. With the demand for performance heating up, 1965 saw an upgraded engine: a 425ci V8 offering 375 hp as well as a 4-speed manual transmission as an option. Unfortunately for the Starfire, 1966 saw the introduction of the radically-designed Oldsmobile Toronado, which upstaged the Starfire atop the Oldsmobile lineup. Luxury items previously offered as standard now became options on the Starfire but standard on the Toronado and the convertible was dropped for 1966 (how ironic for a model born as convertible-only). With the new Toronado taking the flagship role plus the performance market moving to midsize (think the Cutlass 4-4-2) models led Oldsmobile to can the Starfire for 1967.

Second Generation (1975-80)

Oldsmobile would resurrect the Starfire nameplate in 1975 but not as its flagship, but rather a base model that was essentially a subcompact Chevy Monza (similar to the Vega) wearing Oldsmobile badges. Standard engine was a 231ci Buick V6. Transmission choices were a 3-speed auto or 4-speed manual. The only change for 1976 was the addition of a 5-speed manual transmission featuring an overdrive ratio as the 5th gear, no doubt to boost fuel economy. 1977 saw the Buick V6 dropped as standard equipment and replaced with a 140ci I4. The Buick V6 became an option and, come mid year, Chevy's 305ci V8 was added as another option. 1978 saw the 140ci I4 dropped and replaced with Pontiac's “Iron Duke” 151ci I4. 1979 saw minor sheet metal changes and a switch from quad rectangular headlights to duals. 1980 was essentially unchanged and the Starfire was dropped following the model year.

Aurora (1995-2003)
Going into the mid 1990s, Oldsmobile was in a bad way as sales were not even half of what they had been a decade before. Management knew that their brand needed a major boost to stay competitive. Born out of a 1989 concept car, the Aurora was conceived from the start to be a sports sedan. How desperate was Oldsmobile to get a fresh start? So much so that the very word 'Oldsmobile' was nowhere to be found on the car save the radio and engine cover. Instead, a stylized 'A' adorned the new car.

First Generation (1995-1999)

Launched in 1995, the Aurora took its place as Oldsmobile's flagship model (though good luck finding 'Oldsmobile' anywhere on it), displacing the previously top-tier Toronado coupe and 98 Sedan. Going all-out to blend luxury and performance, the Aurora featured many luxury items as standard that were options on similarly-priced cars. These included: dual-zone climate control, dual front airbags, leather seats, walnut interior accents that were actually real wood, a six-speaker sound system, a dual cd/cassette player, and eight-way power front seats. The Aurora also featured as standard equipment a real-time display of gas consumption, a rarity in its day. Among the few options were a power sunroof, a Bose sound system, and heated seats. Transmission was a 4-speed automatic and the engine was a V8 cranking out 250hp. The car received widespread praise for its style, power, handling, and safety. Throughout its run through 1999, the Aurora received basically only minor tweaks, which was not a bad thing considering how widely well-regarded it already was. The full-size
Aurora would serve as the styling foundation for new compact and mid-size models.


Curiously, there were no Auroras for the 2000 model year as Oldsmobile was banking on a new Buick platform on which to build a 88 Series successor and then reintroduce the Aurora as an even more luxurious model for 2001, giving its 88 successor, planned to be called the Antares, a year in the Sun on its own. Unfortunately, that didn't come to pass as Buick scrapped its new platform, which forced Oldsmobile to re brand the planned Antares as the Aurora for a stop-gap solution to fill its flagship slot.

Second Generation (2001-03)

Slightly smaller than its predecessor and no longer sporting a unique look, the new Aurora never got the praise or sales that the first incarnation did, though it could more than hold its own in its market segment against the competition. Perhaps the car never got a fair chance as General Motors announced in late 2000 that it planned to shut down Oldsmobile altogether in the next few years. Clearly, this is not something to boost sales of a new generation of car just as it hits showrooms for the first time. Also, the 2001 Aurora was the first to offer a V6 as an option, though this would end early into the 2002 model year, at which point V8s became standard again. Like its predecessor incarnation, the list of luxury options as standard was long and added new features, which included: keyless entry, alarm, the OnStar system, steering wheel-mounted climate and radio controls, power trunk release, automatic front head and fog lamps, and side airbags. The few new options included a
memory for radio presets and a voice-activated, CD-ROM based navigation system. Production for 2001 was over 50,000 but fell to just over 10,000 for 2002 and barely scraped above 7,000 for 2003, which was to prove the final year for the Aurora as part of the planned shut-down of Oldsmobile itself, which would be history following the 2004 model year.

Plymouth
Satellite (1965-74)

The Plymouth Satellite began its run as the top-tier package of Plymouth's “B” Belvedere line. Plymouth had shrunk its B cars for the 1962 season, which essentially made for a lineup without a full-size model, which the B cars had been through 1961, with the Fury serving as the intermediate. This continued until 1965, which is when the Fury was switched to a full-size model, leaving the B cars in the mid-size slot, which is where they would remain. In 1965, the new Satellite would be the flagship of the B line.

First Generation (1965-67)
With the muscle car craze picking up, V8 engines were standard equipment for the Satellite in 1965, a rarity for a mid-size car. Available engines included a standard 273ci V8 with the 318, 361, 383 and 426ci wedge (not hemi) as options. 1965 saw only 2 door hardtops and convertibles offered as body styles. Inside, bucket seats and center consoles were standard. Transmission choices included a 3-speed automatic or 3 and 4-speed manuals. 1966 was highlighted by one major addition under the hood: the availability of the 426ci Hemi. While officially rated at 425hp, insider leaks from people at work on the engine claimed power in excess of 600hp. 1967 saw minor changes in trim and sheet metal, most notably a switch from dual to quad headlights but mechanically, the cars were the same with the exception of a new engine offering: the 440ci Magnum V8..

Second Generation (1968-70)
1968 saw the Satellite lineup expanded from 2 models to four with the addition of a 4-door sedan and wagon. The car also underwent a major stylistic revision, sporting a much curvier body but one nowhere nearly as aerodynamic as Dodge's new generation of Charger. 1968 also saw the addition of a new model to the B line: the famous Roadrunner. Engine choices remained unchanged but a new Sport Satellite was launched, with the base engine being the 318ci V8 instead of the 273. Transmission choices remained the same as did the cars themselves through the 1970 model year.

Third Generation (1971-74)
1971 saw another huge redesign of the sheet metal, resulting in an even curvier “fuselage” body. A new 2 door sedan was offered while the convertible was dropped, as was the 440ci V8. As the gas shortages were beginning to happen, Plymouth offered buyers looking for economy the 225ci Slant 6, the first time a Satellite could be had with a 6-cylinder power plant. Buyers who craved power could still order the 426 Hemi as an option for 1971, though this would prove to be the final year for Chrysler's fire breathing 'Elephant' engine as it was dropped for 1972 following new emissions/fuel economy standards mandated for 1972. For buyers looking for a touch of luxury, the wagon could be had with wood grain paneling starting in 1971. Again, transmissions were a choice between 3-speed auto or 3 and 4-speed manuals. Again, the 1972-74 models would remain little changed in the same vein as the previous generation had done following the initial restyle. Plymouth moved the Fury back to mid-size for 1975 and thus de-orbited the Satellite following the 1974 model year.

Fact sand Figures:
* Styles: 2 door hardtop, coupe, sedan, 4 door sedan and wagon

* Engines: 225ci I6, 273-440ci conventional V8s, plus the 426ci hemi

* Transmissions: 3 speed auto, 3 and 4 speed manual

* Valuation: anything with a hemi is worth a fortune today

* A 1971 hemi Cuda convertible with a 4-speed sold for over $3 ½ million in 2014



The Car That Made 'The King'
One can't help mentioning 'King' Richard Petty when discussing about mid-size Plymouths of the 1960s and 70s. Richard Petty used Plymouth's mid-size B cars starting in 1962 and continuing through 1972, with the exception of his only year at Ford in 1969. By the time he switched to Dodge in 1973, Petty had already won over 120 races in Plymouths. Of all those years, the 1967 season was nothing short of amazing and it was then that 'The Randleman Rocket' became 'The King.' Richard Petty's 1967 season was nothing short of an all-out assault on the record books. The highlights include: won 27 of 46 races run (.586 win percent), won 10 consecutive races, had the national championship won with 6 races left in season, and surpassed his father, Lee, as NASCAR's all-time win leader.

Sundance (1987-94)

Identical to the Dodge Shadow, the Plymouth Sundance was launched as an economy model for the 1987 model year. All cars had I4 engines (albeit many different ones) until a V6 became available for 1992. To keep costs down, only 2 models were offered during the entire production run: 3 and 5 door hatchbacks that were designed to look as though they had conventional trunks. The extra storage space created by the design was a major selling point advertised by manufacturers. Transmissions were a 3-speed auto or a 5-speed manual through 1992, when a 4-speed auto was offered with the new V6. Year to year changes were minor through the production run until the Sundance was replaced by the all-new Neon for 1995.




Pontiac
Star Chief (1954-66)

Began in 1954 as a model in its own right and was essentially an extra luxurious Pontiac Chieftain, previously Pontiac's flagship large car. Throughout its dozen year run, all years of the car are easily identified by its star emblems (shapes and configurations do vary) along the sides. Unlike a lot of cars for the time, there were few variations of the Star Chief during its run and changes took place on an almost yearly basis.

1954
Introduced as a model in its own right as an upscale Pontiac Chieftain, the Star Chief was the first Pontiac to use a non-Chevy wheelbase (123.5 inches). To emphasize luxury, the car offered an optional air conditioner-a first in its price range and a rarity at any price in its day. The only engine was the old-style 248ci I8, a holdover from pre-WWII. As a bit of pop culture trivia, a Star Chief was featured prominently in an episode of I Love Lucy.

1955
The Star Chief got new sheet metal and a modern 247ci V8 engine. A showy feature, the plastic Indian head hood ornament lit up when the headlights were turned on. 1955 also introduced a 2-door hardtop Safari wagon similar to the Chevy Nomad. The basic sheet metal would remain basically the same through 1957.

1956 got a 316ci V8

1957 upgraded to a 347ci V8 and saw a Bonneville trim package added

1958 saw the Bonneville become a model in its own right and take Pontiac's premier model slot. The Star Chief now was the maker's second tier car. The Star Chief saw its 4-door models dropped and was only offered as 2 door hardtops and convertibles. The Star Chief (like all Pontiacs) got a noticeably longer, lower, wider body with updated chassis. The engine was the previous year's 347ci V8, now bored out to 370ci.

1959 saw the Star Chief get even wider in keeping with Pontiac's “wide track” design. The convertible was dropped, limiting the Star Chief to sedans and hardtops as the Bonneville and new Catalina got their maker's primary attention.

1960 saw the Star Chief revert to 4 doors only thanks to the advent of the Ventura and the only new option was an electric clock.

1961. The Star Chief and the entire General Motors lineup got a much-needed, modernized makeover for 1961. Gone were wrap around windshields and tail fins as was the Star Chief's station wagon option. Hardly a unique model anymore, the Star Chief was now virtually identical to the Catalina except for Bonneville-style tail lights and the star emblems.

1962 saw the addition of a 421ci V8 with a pair of 4barrel carburetors rated at 405hp. Very few Star Chiefs got the potent power plant. 1963-64 were largely status quo.

1965 saw a major redesign featuring a much curvier body but under the metal, little was changed this year or in 1966, which would prove to be the Star Chief's final year.


Sunbird (1976-94)
Launched in 1976 to meet the need for fuel efficiency in the era of worsening fuel shortages that saw blocks-long lines to gas stations in some places, the Pontiac Sunbird spent its entire life as a subcompact, albeit in drastically-different forms.

First Generation (1976-“80”)
The 1976-80 Sunbirds were traditional rear-wheel
drive cars and were badge-engineered Chevy Monzas. In its first year, only a notchback coupe was offered and a 140ci I4 was the only engine, though Buick's 231ci V6 was quickly added as an option. Transmissions offered more choice as a 3-speed auto and 4 and 5-speed manuals were offered. The 5-speed was rated at a then astounding 28mpg city and 34mpg highway. 1977 saw the 151ci I4 “Iron Duke” become the base engine and a hatchback added to the lineup. 1978 saw the adding of a station wagon to the body styles and the availability of Chevy's 305ci V8 as an engine option. 1979 was status quo but 1980 saw the station wagon dropped along with the V8 option. Interestingly, 1980 saw an unusually-long production year as extra models were produced to carry dealers through 1981 as General Motors was busy reworking its compacts to front wheel drive, slated to debut in 1982. Officially, there were no 1981 Sunbirds though new 1980s could be bought as new through the 1981 calendar year.
Second Generation (1982-1994)

1982 saw the Sunbird switch to front wheel drive. However, unlike other GM brands, which canned the names of their mid 70s to 1980 compacts, Pontiac kept the Sunbird nameplate around for the front wheel drive platform's 1982 debut, which would also prove to be the final year for the carburetor as Sunbirds became fuel injected for 1983. All cars (coupes, sedans, wagons, hatchbacks) were equipped with various I4s until 1991 when a V6 was again offered. Transmission options remained the same as those offered on the 1976-80 models. 1983 saw the addition of a convertible. Starting in 1984, Pontiac began to tweak the I4 for performance via various configurations, which often outperformed competing models' V6s. The Sunbird underwent a major cosmetic facelift in mid 1988, hence the 1988 ½ year designation, but the mechanicals remained largely the same. The convertible was dropped following the 1989 model year. Following the 1988 ½ facelift, year to year changes were minor. As a phase-out was planned for 1994, Sunbird trim packages were dropped and the cars became increasingly alike. The 1994 models still in production were essentially 1993s sold at a lower price. Sunfire (1995-2005)
Launched in 1995 to replace the Sunbird, the Sunfire received a dramatically updated look compared to its predecessor. The Sunfire came in 2 door convertibles/coupes or a 4 door
sedan and shared much with the Chevy Cavalier. Through its decade run, engines were all I4s and transmissions were a 3 or 4 speed auto or 5 speed manual. Convertibles were discontinued after 2002 and the car was dropped following 2005 and replaced by the Pontiac G5, which was essentially a Chevy Cobalt in Pontiac trim.

Solstice (2006-2010)
Based off a 2002 concept car, the Solstice was Pontiac's first two-seater since the quirky, mid-engine Fiero of the 1980s. Unlike the Fiero, the Solstice offered a traditional front engine, rear-wheel drive design and could be had as either a coupe or convertible. While a performance enthusiast may initially brush off the Solstice's I4 engine as too weak for a sports car, the Solstice was no slouch under the hood as the I4s were tricked out to produce 177hp
(over 1hp/cubic inch-the muscle car era's gold standard), thus giving the car a lot of get up and go. Transmission options through the production run was either a 5 speed auto or 5 speed manual. Bold styling, performance prowess, and a sub $30,000 price made the Solstice a hit with the public and the press. Pontiac initially had only planned to produce 7,000 for the 2006 model year, but public demand eventually pushed Pontiac to crank out over 10,000 units.

Come 2007, Pontiac upped its game and introduced a special GXP edition that ran through 2009, the last full year of production. The GXP came with a turbocharged I4 engine that could be tweaked via computer programming to produce up to 290hp-a whopping 2.4 horsepower per cubic inch-the best in the history of GM-even bettering Corvette's most potent power plant in the horsepower to cubic inch ratio. The advertised 260hp was no slouch, either and could propel the Solstice from 0-60 in 5.5 seconds. Unfortunately with the economic crash of 2008, it was announced late that year that Pontiac would be shut down following the 2010 model year. 2009 would be the Solstice's final full year and, Pontiac's shuttering announced, demand plummeted. Only 20 model year 2010 Solstices were produced in a 1-month span in April-May, 2009. Pontiac was shut down as planned following the 2010 model year and all plans to sell rights to the Solstice to other manufacturers fell through. While the jury is obviously still not even a decade after production stopped, some consider the Solstice a future classic.




Saturn Motor Company (1985/1991-2010)

Started as a GM project, codenamed “Saturn,” that would focus on producing small, fuel-efficient, high-quality cars to compete with Japanese imports, Saturn was never meant to be a car manufacturer in its own right. When the project began in June, 1982, Japanese imports were eating Detroit's lunch. Burdened by mountains of ever increasing regulations regarding emissions and fuel economy, the quality, reliability, and styling of American cars suffered as manufacturers went all-out to meet government dictated mandates.

The first concept car under Project Saturn was unveiled in 1983 and the company was incorporated in 1985 and billed as a private, employee-owned company. This was done in spite of GM initially planning to launch the Saturn concept under an existing brand as launching an all-new brand that shared no parts with other GM models and creating a whole new dealership network would proive very costly. However, come 1990, GM bought out Saturn and made it a brand in its own right.

The first Saturn production car was built for the 1991 model year but GM's earlier reservations of launching a whole new make of car that shared virtually nothing with the 5 existing GM brands proved true as this was a very costly endeavor come the 1990s. Setting up a whole dealership network added even more financial strain to the effort. The timing of the launch couldn't have been worse, either, as it coincided with the early 1990s recession, which saw the auto industry as a whole take a hit. However, for those who bought Saturns, the feedback was positive as the cars quickly gained a reputation for reliability and economy. The no haggle pricing policy put in place at Saturn dealerships undoubtedly helped, too. On the bad side,, Japanese automakers had begun to set up shop in the States, which allowed them to undercut Saturn by way of eliminating the import costs. Still, while they didn't sell to the (perhaps overly) high expectations, Saturn sales held steady through the 1990s, reaching 500,000 cars by 1993, 1 million by 1995, and 2 million by 1999, which translates to roughly 250,000 cars per year. Not bad for a new start-up company.

In the early 2000s, Saturn expanded its focus from compact cars, introducing its first crossover SUV in 2002 as the market started to switch away from traditional cars and toward trucks, SUVs, and crossovers. Saturn also started replacing some of its compact car 1990s models with new ones at this time. Saturn expanded its horizons again in 2005 with the launch of its first minivan, which rocketed to popularity in the mid 1990s. During this time, Saturns became increasingly similar to other GM products as supporting a manufacturer that had virtually nothing in common parts-wise with the other 4 brands under the GM umbrella was proving costly. Evidence of this came in 2007 as the Saturn Sky roadster, essentially a clone of the Pontiac Solstice, was introduced. 2007 also saw a midsize sedan and an even larger crossover and 2008 saw Saturn unveil a hybrid concept.

Just as things seemed to be looking up in regards to GM reining in the costs of supporting an upstart make, the American auto industry ran head-on into the 2008 financial meltdown. With the under/unemployment numbers skyrocketing and people struggling to avoid foreclosures on their homes, not many people were looking to buy new cars and GM was put in dire straights. Once the world's largest automaker, GM was eventually forced to take a government bailout to avoid bankruptcy. The joke then went that 'GM' now stood for 'Government Motors.' With the bailout and mandates to trim budgets, GM announced it would focus on its best selling brands: Chevy, Buick, Cadillac, and the truck/SUV-based GMC. No lifeline was extended to Saturn (or Pontiac) and all attempts to sell the brand failed. The company officially ceased to exist on Halloween, 2010


Like What You Just Read?

Why not check out other great stuff about photography, astronomy, associated gear, and how to use it.

Think someone else would find this informative (or at least entertaining)? Use the buttons below to share!




Monday, September 2, 2019

160 Years Ago Today: The Carrington Event

Richard Carrington and his drawing of sunspots that unleashed 1859's solar superstorm.


It was exactly 160 years ago today that Earth's magnetic field was left shuddering like it had never done before in all of recorded history. Why? It was 160 years ago today that Earth was in the waning phases of the mother of all solar superstorms, known as the Carrington Event after the astronomer who witnessed the initial solar outburst as it happened, Richard Carrington.

The Sun was soon to hit maximum for the 10th solar cycle come early 1860. However, in late August, 1859, the Sun suddenly filled up with dark sunspots and aurora started to be sighted at unusually low latitudes. On August 29, aurora were sighted in Queensland, Australia, a rarity. Then, just before noon on September 1, another flare was observed simultaneously by two astronomers named Richard: Carrington, whose name is now immortalized in history, and Hogsdon, whose name is lost to obscurity.

Reaching Earth in an amazingly fast 17 hours (the widely agreed upon consensus was that the flare of August 29 cleared the path of solar wind and plasma for the flare of September 1), the coronal mass ejection slammed into the Earth's upper atmosphere as no storm had ever done in all of recorded history.The problem with solar superstorms is that they do not harm a living and no one would have even known that they had existed in the age before electronics. There could have been hundreds of storms of Carrington magnitude or even stronger throughout Earth's history but, until we developed electronic technology, we had no way of knowing that they even existed. However, come 1859 and the dawn of the electronic age, there would be consequences.

How strong was the Carrington Event? The solar storm was so strong that telegraph lines, the only electronics of the time, started smoking and/or caught fire. Receivers shocked operators and even emitted sparks. Receivers not destroyed and hooked up to telegraph lines that were not destroyed were able to, for a brief time, transmit without batteries. The first transatlantic cable, laid from the United States to England only a year before, was destroyed. Aurora were sighted as far South as Hawaii, Central America, and sub-Saharan Africa. The aurora were so bright that newspapers could easily be read by their light and, at onset, many people got up thinking that dawn was near. Many witnesses described the light of the aurora as being brighter than the Full Moon.



While it was alone in strength, the Carrington Event is not an isolated event as several strong solar storms have hit Earth since then.



In 1921, Earth was impacted by another large solar storm. Like during the Carrington event, telegraph service suffered as fuses blew and equipment was damaged, resulting in a total near-cessation of telegraph service, including that carried by undersea cables.



In 1989, the strongest solar storm of the Space Age (and the strongest anyone reading this can remember) took place over Canada and resulted in a total blackout for much of the Quebec province for nearly 12 hours. As strong as that storm was at a rating of X15, it was estimated (solar flares couldn't be measured at the time) to be far weaker than the storm of 1921 and nowhere near as strong as the Carrington Event, which has been estimated to be anywhere between X45 and X60).

Fortunately for us, the Carrington Event arrived before our development of nationwide power grids, which could have been completely wiped out by such an event today, which could very well bring about the collapse of modern civilization itself.

Feeling like you can rest easy? Well, don't. In 2012, a solar flare with a power estimated to be similar to that of the Carrington Event missed Earth by about a week. The good news is that the government finally looks to be taking some meaningful action towards mitigating the now well-known risk posed by such solar superstorms.



Until our power grid is finally hardened and our current way of life (perhaps our very lives themselves) protected, we can only hope that our 160 year run of good luck continues.
Like What You Just Read?

Why not check out other great stuff about photography, astronomy, associated gear, and how to use it.

Think someone else would find this informative (or at least entertaining)? Use the buttons below to share!





Sunday, July 21, 2019

Apollo 11 50th Anniversary is Golden, NASA's Future Uncertain

Michael Collins (left) and Buzz Aldrin (right) with President Trump in the Oval Office.

Today or yesterday (depending on your location) marked the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing. In the lead-up, celebrations commemorating the 50th anniversary of the greatest feat of exploration in human history took place all over the country. On Friday, surviving Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins, along with Neil Armstrong's sons, were the guests of honor at the White House celebration of the historic achievement.

While the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 is undoubtedly a great source of pride for Americans (and should be for the whole world), remembering past greatness has also prompted many to look toward America's future in space, which is, unfortunately, not so clear.

In stark contrast to the singular focus NASA exhibited in the 1960s, the NASA of the 21st century could be described as lost not in space, but on the ground.

With mounting calls for the retirement of the Space Shuttle following the 2003 Columbia disaster, then President George W. Bush announced the Constellation Program in 2005, which sought to return Americans to the Moon by 2020 via heavy lift rockets similar to the Saturn V. There were to be two versions of the new Aries rocket: one designed for manned launches and another designed for heavy cargo payloads.

By 2009, a study concluded that Constellation was grossly over budget. As a result, in early 2010, then President Obama announced that Constellation was going to be canceled and replaced with a single rocket: the Space Launch System (SLS), which could be built in multiple configurations while utilizing technology originally developed for Constellation.



Fast forward 9 years and it's more of the same.


The first SLS launch, set to be an unmanned capsule around the Moon, was set for December, 2017. The first manned flight was targeted for mid 2021. Obviously, December, 2017 is over a year in the rear view mirror, which does not bode well for 2021. Official target dates for the unmanned launch is now 2020 and the manned launch is now back to 2022.



However, manned American spaceflight has a new champion in President Trump, who has made it very clear in the form of executive orders that he intends to see to it that Americans will once again be able to not only fly themselves into space, but to the Moon. Earlier this year, NASA announced that its Project Artemis (the twin sister of Apollo in Greek mythology) seeks to land astronauts on the Moon again by 2024 with the long-term goal being the creation of a permanently manned lunar base that will serve as a stepping stone to Mars.


Additionally, there is a new player in space that wasn't even imaginable in the 1960s: the private sector.

While there are now numerous private companies involved in spaceflight, the far and away leader of the proverbial pack is SpaceX.

Looking at SpaceX and what it has achieved since its 2002 founding is like looking at a shopping list. SpaceX was the first private company to: launch a rocket into orbit (2008), orbit and then recover a spacecraft (2010), send a spacecraft to the International Space Station (2012), complete a propulsive landing of a rocket (2015), reuse a rocket (2017), and launch a payload into solar orbit (2018).

The most intriguing possibility, however, is that offered by SpaceX's Falcon Heavy rocket. First launched in February, 2018, according to NASA, the Falcon Heavy is capable of launching astronauts to the Moon, although the SLS is the preferred option. With the SLS falling ever farther behind schedule, there is a very real possibility that the Falcon Heavy could be NASA's ticket to the Moon by 2024 if the SLS is not ready to go in time.

Yes, these are not the 1960s when manned spaceflight was a matter of national priority and pride, but the possibilities offered by the private sector are undoubtedly exciting, too. NASA astronauts riding a privately-owned rocket to the Moon? The idea would have seemed crazy in 1969 but, come 2019, this could be the future of America in space.

The future of manned spaceflight may look different, but the possibilities are truly limitless.



Like What You Just Read?

Why not check out other great stuff about photography, astronomy, associated gear, and how to use it.

Think someone else would find this informative (or at least entertaining)? Use the buttons below to share!


Sunday, April 21, 2019

In-Depth Review: Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO

The Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO


Tech Specs

Focal Length: 17mm
Dimensions: 2.2 x 3.3 in.
Weight: 15.3.
Maximum Aperture: f3.5
Minimum Aperture: f
Diaphragm Blades:
Front Element: non-rotating, extending
Optical arrangement: 11 elements in 9 groups
Autofocus Mechanism: Mechanical drive
Closest Focus: 9.8 inches
Maximum magnification: .11x
Filter Size: 77mm

Background
It seems that with every new generation of camera lenses, opticians are able to push the extremes a little bit wider. By the arrival of the 1980s, sub 20mm was now the new standard for ultrawide SLR lenses. Of these, the Tokina 17 f3.5 was one of the most affordable. With the arrival of the AF era, Tokina created a new AF version of its 17mm f3.5 optic, the 17mm f3.5 AT-X, for 1993. The only real fault of this lens: a built-on lens hood, a bit of overkill for a lens without a protruding front element. Eventually, Tokina redid its 17mm ultrawide in 1999, keeping the optical formula the same, but redoing the cosmetics and dubbing the new model 'PRO.' AF was now controlled by the famous Tokina clutch system and the idiotic built-on hood became a thing of the past. To date, the Tokina 17mm f3.5 ATX-PRO lens being reviewed here, discontinued as of 2005 is Tokina's last ultrawide prime ever produced save for Sony.

Build Quality 5/5
Tokina is a company known for its high standards of construction and the Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO is built to the highest of standards, namely, out of solid metal. Honestly, many manufacturer lenses of today aren't built anywhere near as well as the third-party Tokina offering. Picking up the lens, it is quite heavy but this heavy construction goes a long way in inspiring confidence, showcasing that this lens is a true photographic tool and not some dinky toy. Onto the mechanics, Tokina was nice enough to include an aperture ring lock switch so that the ring can be locked at minimum aperture for use on today's cameras. In the act of focusing, the front element extends a tiny, tiny bit (maybe 2mm) but does nor rotate. The focus ring is of the variety where one must find the window to move it. To do this, simply rotate the ring while pushing forward/pulling back on it and wait for it to snap into the desired position.

Note the AF/MF ring positions.

Notice the Nikon-only AF slot screw at 5 o' clock
 

AF Performance 4/5
As with all ultrawide lenses, AF speed on the Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO is, at least on the D700, very fast and, for a mechanical drive lens, very quiet. However, as with all mechanical drive lenses, there is no full time manual focus feature as is seen on newer optics, which means that you need to manually switch from AF to MF mode. At least with Nikon, AF speed has a lot to do with the camera, so it may be slightly slower/faster on yours depending on what you have. In regards to accuracy, focus is dead-on every time. Additionally, thanks to the clutch mechanism, the focus ring doesn't spin when the AF is operating, so hold it anywhere.


Optics: 4/5
A lot goes into determining the optical quality of a lens, so let's look at them separately.

Sharpness
For a lens of such an extreme design, the Tokina 17f3.5 ATX-PRO performs very well. Straight out of the gate at f3.5, the center is razor sharp, with virtually nothing gained by stopping down. At f16, though, sharpness falls off due to diffraction limiting. Mid Frame, f3.5 is a little soft, but f5.6-f11 are all razor sharp, with diffraction again creating a softening at f16. In the corners, the lens is pretty mushy wide open but sharpens up nicely at f8, save for the extreme (emphasis on extreme) corners of the frame. F11 is also very good and, yet again, diffraction limiting sets in at f16. Overall, the best overall image quality across the frame is at f8, with nothing gained by closing up a stop to f11. Overall, not bad for such an extreme optic of mid 1990s design. On crop frame cameras, it should be pretty much razor sharp across the frame.



Vignetting
This lens vignettes noticeably when shot wide open. Stopping down to f5.6 greatly reduces the corner darkening and closing up to f8 reduces it a little more, with nothing gained past that point. If shooting on a crop camera, vignetting should be a non-issue.
.

Distortion
For a 17mm optic, distortion is very well controlled even when shooting brick walls. In real life shooting, it should go unnoticed.





Chromatic Aberration
For a company known for lenses that had false color (purple) chromatic aberrations during the time this optic was produced, the Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO does very well here. Only the biggest pixel peepers will notice anything at all at f3.5. Seriously, you have to actively look for it to see it at all even at 100%. The composite is 100% and the other image is the full uncropped shot.

Flare/Ghosting
Avoid bright lights just outside the frame as the lens will flare, thought obnoxiously. The hood doesn't help much if at all.

Value: 5/5
Simply put, this is a lens that anyone with a FX format Nikon camera should take a serious look at. Priced at around $350 on the used market, this lens is the way to go for anyone wanting a portable, ultrawide optic that won't break the bank. Simply put, nothing else comes close to the Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO in regards to price. The best part: no protruding, vulnerable front element

Competition
Simply put, there are no direct competitors for the Tokina 17 f3.5 ATX-PRO. Yes, there are wider optics out there, namely the 14mm f2.8s everyone is making, but these are comparatively large, unwieldy lenses that can never fit into a pocket and that have bulbous, flare/scratch-susceptible front elements. On top of that, all the manufacturer optics are all are priced much, much higher. Tamron used to make a 14 f2.8 but, like the manufacturer optics, it has a bulbous front element and is the build quality is greatly inferior. If one doesn't mind adding a few millimeters of focal length, there are some interesting 20mm options, Nikon's 20 f2.8 and Sigma's 20mm f1.8. Neither are built to the standards of the Tokina but the Nikon is much smaller and 2/3 stop faster and the Sigma is 2 stops faster but much larger and, according to some reviews, quite soft wide open across the frame, unlike the Tokina. In all, there are a lot of interesting ultrawide primes on the market but no single lens that can go toe-to-toe with Tokina's masterpiece.

The Ultrawide Myth
Many beginners believe (incorrectly) that an ultrawide lens like this will be just the thing for “getting it all in” the frame. Well, there's yes and no to that. Yes, you'll sweep up everything around you but, on the other hand, your point of focus will be appear to be pushed way into the distance. Long story short, this is not a landscape lens. On the other hand, if you find yourself shooting in tight quarters and constantly wishing that you could only back up more to fully capture a scene, this is the lens for you. Who is this lens for? Indoor architectural photographers and even realtors come to mind. Astrophotographers (like me) will also love this lens for its ability to capture nearly all-sky views, especially during meteor showers, without distortion. Paparazzi? Yes, even you scumbags of the photography world will benefit from this lens as its ultrawide field will allow you to just about shove your camera up a celebrity's nose and still get a full headshot. Crop frame shooters? Don't waste your money here as 17mm on your camera isn't ultrawide by any means. Get something in the 8-12mm range instead.


Conclusion: 4.5/5
The Tokina 17mm f3.5 ATX-PRO is quite a lens even before one considers its rock-bottom price point. Build quality and AF capabilities are top-notch and the optics, though not perfect, are very respectable for a lens in this class. The real shame about this lens is that it is out of production and so difficult to find. To start with, Tokina is the smallest of the major third party lens manufacturers, which means that there were less of these lenses produced than its Sigma, Tamron, and not to mention Nikon near-equivalents. Perhaps the true barometer of how good a lens is is to look for the frequency with which it appears on the used market. In the case of the Tokina 17mm, one hardly ever sees it show up, even at the big places like Adorama, B&H, and even the world's largest used photo gear dealer, KEH. Simply put, people know a good product when they get one and are reluctant to let go of it. Such is the case with this Tokina gem. Bottom line, if you have a FF camera, this is the best $300ish you can ever spend, that is if you're lucky enough to find this lens at all. 



Tokina Fan? Check Out These Reviews
Tokina 100 f2.8 ATX-PRO Macro
Tokina 80-200 f2.8 AT-X
Tokina 80-400 f4-5.6 AT-X
Tokina 28-70 f2.6-2.8 ATX-PRO



Like What You Just Read?

Why not check out other great stuff about photography, astronomy, and associated gear?

Think others would find this useful (or at least entertaining)? Share with the buttons below!

Monday, April 1, 2019

President Trump Signs EMP Executive Order (With Full Text)



On March 26, President Trump signed an executive order directing the federal government to put the threat posed by electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) at the top of the national security priority list and fast-track implementing recommendations suggested by the nearly 20-year old Congressional EMP Commission.



For the United States, this is a move over 50 years past due.



EMPs were first observed in 1962 during a nuclear test called Starfish Prime. In the test, a 1.4 megaton H-bomb (over 100 times as powerful as the Hiroshima A-bomb) was detonated roughly 250 miles up in the atmosphere. The goal of the test was to see how a high-altitude Soviet nuclear detonation would interfere with U.S. ICBMs. At the time of the test, it was known that a nuclear explosion would unleash, in addition to massive amounts of energy, gamma rays, X-rays, and supercharged subatomic particles, all of which could play havoc with electronics, including our missiles.



While the EMP was predicted, its strength was a surprise. There were artificial aurora, widespread radio blackouts, and electrical surges on planes (thankfully planes' controls at the time were purely mechanical). Hundreds of miles away in Honolulu, streetlights exploded, telephone service was disrupted, and there were blackouts. A long-lasting effect was an artificial band of radiation around the Earth that persisted for months. Several satellites, including the pioneering Telestar 1, were destroyed.



While the Starfish Prime EMP was artificial, the same thing could happen if the Sun were to explode in a massive Earth-facing flare, which has happened before.



In 1859, there was a solar storm named the Carrington Event after the astronomer who witnessed the outburst. The solar storm was so strong that telegraph lines, the only electronics of the time, started smoking and/or caught fire. Receivers shocked operators and even emitted sparks. Receivers not destroyed were able to, for a brief time, transmit wirelessly. Aurora were sighted as far South as Hawaii, Central America, and sub-Saharan Africa.



In the present, with modern civilization itself almost completely reliant upon electronics, a collapse of the national power grid could lead to the collapse of civilization itself as virtually every device relying on electricity could be rendered inoperable. In 2008, a Congressional EMP Commission report stated that up to 90% of the U.S. population could be dead within a year of a national power grid collapse, due in large part to starvation, exposure, disease, and radioactive fallout.



SEE ALSO: Why EMPs Matter (the In-Depth Version)



The best aspect of this executive order is that it places the White House, not Congress or bureaucrats, at the vanguard of defense against solar storms/EMPs. Why is this good? The dangers of EMPs have been known for decades yet Congress and the Departments of Energy and Homeland Security have done nothing of any material value thus far. Hopefully, executive action will finally see to it that this long overlooked threat to not only national security but civilization itself will be addressed.



This is something that all Americans, regardless of political beliefs, should be able to agree on.



The Full Text of the Executive Order:





Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses



By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1.  Purpose.  An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) has the potential to disrupt, degrade, and damage technology and critical infrastructure systems.  Human-made or naturally occurring EMPs can affect large geographic areas, disrupting elements critical to the Nation’s security and economic prosperity, and could adversely affect global commerce and stability.  The Federal Government must foster sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective approaches to improving the Nation’s resilience to the effects of EMPs.
Sec. 2.  Definitions.  As used in this order:
(a)  “Critical infrastructure” means systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital to the United States that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination of those matters.
(b)  “Electromagnetic pulse” is a burst of electromagnetic energy.  EMPs have the potential to negatively affect technology systems on Earth and in space.  A high-altitude EMP (HEMP) is a type of human-made EMP that occurs when a nuclear device is detonated at approximately 40 kilometers or more above the surface of Earth.  A geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) is a type of natural EMP driven by a temporary disturbance of Earth’s magnetic field resulting from interactions with solar eruptions.  Both HEMPs and GMDs can affect large geographic areas.
(c)  “National Critical Functions” means the functions of government and the private sector so vital to the United States that their disruption, corruption, or dysfunction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof.
(d)  “National Essential Functions” means the overarching responsibilities of the Federal Government to lead and sustain the Nation before, during, and in the aftermath of a catastrophic emergency, such as an EMP that adversely affects the performance of Government.
(e)  “Prepare” and “preparedness” mean the actions taken to plan, organize, equip, train, and exercise to build and sustain the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to, and recover from those threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation.  These terms include the prediction and notification of impending EMPs.
(f)  A “Sector-Specific Agency” (SSA) is the Federal department or agency that is responsible for providing institutional knowledge and specialized expertise as well as leading, facilitating, or supporting the security and resilience programs and associated activities of its designated critical infrastructure sector in the all-hazards environment.  The SSAs are those identified in Presidential Policy Directive 21 of February 12, 2013 (Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience).
Sec. 3.  Policy.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to prepare for the effects of EMPs through targeted approaches that coordinate whole-of-government activities and encourage private-sector engagement.  The Federal Government must provide warning of an impending EMP; protect against, respond to, and recover from the effects of an EMP through public and private engagement, planning, and investment; and prevent adversarial events through deterrence, defense, and nuclear nonproliferation efforts.  To achieve these goals, the Federal Government shall engage in risk-informed planning, prioritize research and development (R&D) to address the needs of critical infrastructure stakeholders, and, for adversarial threats, consult Intelligence Community assessments.
(b)  To implement the actions directed in this order, the Federal Government shall promote collaboration and facilitate information sharing, including the sharing of threat and vulnerability assessments, among executive departments and agencies (agencies), the owners and operators of critical infrastructure, and other relevant stakeholders, as appropriate.  The Federal Government shall also provide incentives, as appropriate, to private-sector partners to encourage innovation that strengthens critical infrastructure against the effects of EMPs through the development and implementation of best practices, regulations, and appropriate guidance.
Sec. 4.  Coordination.  (a)  The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), through National Security Council staff and in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), shall coordinate the development and implementation of executive branch actions to assess, prioritize, and manage the risks of EMPs.  The APNSA shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the President summarizing progress on the implementation of this order, identifying gaps in capability, and recommending how to address those gaps.
(b)  To further the Federal R&D necessary to prepare the Nation for the effects of EMPs, the Director of OSTP shall coordinate efforts of agencies through the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).  The Director of OSTP, through the NSTC, shall annually review and assess the R&D needs of agencies conducting preparedness activities for EMPs, consistent with this order.
Sec. 5.  Roles and Responsibilities.  (a)  The Secretary of State shall:
(i)   lead the coordination of diplomatic efforts with United States allies and international partners regarding enhancing resilience to the effects of EMPs; and
(ii)  in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other relevant agencies, strengthen nuclear nonproliferation and deterrence efforts, which would reduce the likelihood of an EMP attack on the United States or its allies and partners by limiting the availability of nuclear devices.
(b)  The Secretary of Defense shall:
(i)    in cooperation with the heads of relevant agencies and with United States allies, international partners, and private-sector entities as appropriate, improve and develop the ability to rapidly characterize, attribute, and provide warning of EMPs, including effects on space systems of interest to the United States;
(ii)   provide timely operational observations, analyses, forecasts, and other products for naturally occurring EMPs to support the mission of the Department of Defense along with United States allies and international partners, including the provision of alerts and warnings for natural EMPs that may affect weapons systems, military operations, or the defense of the United States;
(iii)  conduct R&D and testing to understand the effects of EMPs on Department of Defense systems and infrastructure, improve capabilities to model and simulate the environments and effects of EMPs, and develop technologies to protect Department of Defense systems and infrastructure from the effects of EMPs to ensure the successful execution of Department of Defense missions;
(iv)   review and update existing EMP-related standards for Department of Defense systems and infrastructure, as appropriate;
(v)    share technical expertise and data regarding EMPs and their potential effects with other agencies and with the private sector, as appropriate;
(vi)   incorporate attacks that include EMPs as a factor in defense planning scenarios; and
(vii)  defend the Nation from adversarial EMPs originating outside of the United States through defense and deterrence, consistent with the mission and national security policy of the Department of Defense.
(c)  The Secretary of the Interior shall support the research, development, deployment, and operation of capabilities that enhance understanding of variations of Earth’s magnetic field associated with EMPs.
(d)  The Secretary of Commerce shall:
(i)   provide timely and accurate operational observations, analyses, forecasts, and other products for natural EMPs, exclusive of the responsibilities of the Secretary of Defense set forth in subsection (b)(ii) of this section; and
(ii)  use the capabilities of the Department of Commerce, the private sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations to continuously improve operational forecasting services and the development of standards for commercial EMP technology.
(e)  The Secretary of Energy shall conduct early-stage R&D, develop pilot programs, and partner with other agencies and the private sector, as appropriate, to characterize sources of EMPs and their couplings to the electric power grid and its subcomponents, understand associated potential failure modes for the energy sector, and coordinate preparedness and mitigation measures with energy sector partners.
(f)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall:
(i)    provide timely distribution of information on EMPs and credible associated threats to Federal, State, and local governments, critical infrastructure owners and operators, and other stakeholders;
(ii)   in coordination with the heads of any relevant SSAs, use the results of risk assessments to better understand and enhance resilience to the effects of EMPs across all critical infrastructure sectors, including coordinating the identification of national critical functions and the prioritization of associated critical infrastructure at greatest risk to the effects of EMPs;
(iii)  coordinate response to and recovery from the effects of EMPs on critical infrastructure, in coordination with the heads of appropriate SSAs;
(iv)   incorporate events that include EMPs as a factor in preparedness scenarios and exercises;
(v)    in coordination with the heads of relevant SSAs, conduct R&D to better understand and more effectively model the effects of EMPs on national critical functions and associated critical infrastructure — excluding Department of Defense systems and infrastructure — and develop technologies and guidelines to enhance these functions and better protect this infrastructure;
(vi)   maintain survivable means to provide necessary emergency information to the public during and after EMPs; and
(vii)  in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy, and informed by intelligence-based threat assessments, develop quadrennial risk assessments on EMPs, with the first risk assessment delivered within 1 year of the date of this order.
(g)  The Director of National Intelligence shall:
(i)   coordinate the collection, analysis, and promulgation, as appropriate, of intelligence-based assessments on adversaries’ capabilities to conduct an attack utilizing an EMP and the likelihood of such an attack; and
(ii)  provide intelligence-based threat assessments to support the heads of relevant SSAs in the development of quadrennial risk assessments on EMPs.
(h)  The heads of all SSAs, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall enhance and facilitate information sharing with private-sector counterparts, as appropriate, to enhance preparedness for the effects of EMPs, to identify and share vulnerabilities, and to work collaboratively to reduce vulnerabilities.
(i)  The heads of all agencies that support National Essential Functions shall ensure that their all­hazards preparedness planning sufficiently addresses EMPs, including through mitigation, response, and recovery, as directed by national preparedness policy.
Sec. 6.  Implementation.  (a)  Identifying national critical functions and associated priority critical infrastructure at greatest risk.
(i)   Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of SSAs and other agencies as appropriate, shall identify and list the national critical functions and associated priority critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets, including space-based assets that, if disrupted, could reasonably result in catastrophic national or regional effects on public health or safety, economic security, or national security.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall update this list as necessary.
(ii)  Within 1 year of the identification described in subsection (a)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of other agencies as appropriate, shall, using appropriate government and private-sector standards for EMPs, assess which identified critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets are most vulnerable to the effects of EMPs.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide this list to the President, through the APNSA.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall update this list using the results produced pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, and as necessary thereafter.
(b)  Improving understanding of the effects of EMPs.
(i)    Within 180 days of the identification described in subsection (a)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of SSAs and in consultation with the Director of OSTP and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall review test data — identifying any gaps in such data — regarding the effects of EMPs on critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets representative of those throughout the Nation.
(ii)   Within 180 days of identifying the gaps in existing test data, as directed by subsection (b)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of SSAs and in consultation with the Director of OSTP and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall use the sector partnership structure identified in the National Infrastructure Protection Plan to develop an integrated cross-sector plan to address the identified gaps.  The heads of agencies identified in the plan shall implement the plan in collaboration with the private sector, as appropriate.
(iii)  Within 1 year of the date of this order, and as appropriate thereafter, the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the heads of other agencies and the private sector, as appropriate, shall review existing standards for EMPs and develop or update, as necessary, quantitative benchmarks that sufficiently describe the physical characteristics of EMPs, including waveform and intensity, in a form that is useful to and can be shared with owners and operators of critical infrastructure.
(iv)   Within 4 years of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior shall complete a magnetotelluric survey of the contiguous United States to help critical infrastructure owners and operators conduct EMP vulnerability assessments.
(c)  Evaluating approaches to mitigate the effects of EMPs.
(i)    Within 1 year of the date of this order, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy, and in consultation with the Director of OSTP, the heads of other appropriate agencies, and private-sector partners as appropriate, shall submit to the President, through the APNSA, a report that analyzes the technology options available to improve the resilience of critical infrastructure to the effects of EMPs.  The Secretaries of Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security shall also identify gaps in available technologies and opportunities for future technological developments to inform R&D activities.
(ii)   Within 180 days of the completion of the activities directed by subsections (b)(iii) and (c)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of other agencies and in consultation with the private sector as appropriate, shall develop and implement a pilot test to evaluate available engineering approaches for mitigating the effects of EMPs on the most vulnerable critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets, as identified in subsection (a)(ii) of this section.
(iii)  Within 1 year of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of relevant SSAs, and in consultation with appropriate regulatory and utility commissions and other stakeholders, shall identify regulatory and non regulatory mechanisms, including cost recovery measures, that can enhance private-sector engagement to address the effects of EMPs.
(d)  Strengthening critical infrastructure to withstand the effects of EMPs.
(i)    Within 90 days of completing the actions directed in subsection (c)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy and in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies and with the private sector as appropriate, shall develop a plan to mitigate the effects of EMPs on the vulnerable priority critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets identified under subsection (a)(ii) of this section.  The plan shall align with and build on actions identified in reports required by Executive Order 13800 of May 11, 2017 (Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure).  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement those elements of the plan that are consistent with Department of Homeland Security authorities and resources, and report to the APNSA regarding any additional authorities and resources needed to complete its implementation.  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy, shall update the plan as necessary based on results from the actions directed in subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
(ii)   Within 180 days of the completion of the actions identified in subsection (c)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Energy, shall conduct a pilot test to evaluate engineering approaches used to harden a strategic military installation, including infrastructure that is critical to supporting that installation, against the effects of EMPs.
(iii)  Within 180 days of completing the pilot test described in subsection (d)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall report to the President, through the APNSA, regarding the cost and effectiveness of the evaluated approaches.
(e)  Improving response to EMPs.
(i)    Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, in coordination with the heads of appropriate SSAs, shall review and update Federal response plans, programs, and procedures to account for the effects of EMPs.
(ii)   Within 180 days of the completion of actions directed by subsection (e)(i) of this section, agencies that support National Essential Functions shall update operational plans documenting their procedures and responsibilities to prepare for, protect against, and mitigate the effects of EMPs.
(iii)  Within 180 days of identifying vulnerable priority critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets as directed by subsection (a)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and Commerce, and the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, shall provide the Deputy Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and the Director of OSTP with an assessment of the effects of EMPs on critical communications infrastructure, and recommend changes to operational plans to enhance national response and recovery efforts after an EMP.
Sec. 7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 26, 2019.






Like What You Just Read?

Why not check out other great stuff about photography, astronomy, associated gear, and how to use it.

Think someone else would find this informative (or at least entertaining)? Use the buttons below to share!


Friday, February 15, 2019

NASA: 'Opportunity' Rover Dead


NASA has just made a long-expected declaration: its long-lived Opportunity rover is dead. This comes following months of trying and failing to contact the rover, which went silent following a planet-sized dust storm that erupted in June, 2018. With the end of the mission, this truly marks the end of an era in Martian exploration.


Launched way back on July 7, 2003 and landing on January 25, 2004, NASA's twin Mars Exploration Rovers (Spirit was the other) were the second generation of Mars rover and were designed to have a mission life of 90 days. While this does not seem long, 90 days is a lot longer than the 7 days of design life expected for the first Martian rover, Sojourner (1997).



Launched for the Red Planet in 2003, a time which coincided with the closest Earth-Mars approach in thousands of years, Opportunity, along with its twin rover, Spirit, started their journey through space in the hopes of fulfilling a planetary scientist's dream of a large, long-lived, roving vehicle that was to serve as a mobile science platform. In the mission statement, Opportunity and Spirit were given a 90 day life estimate during which they would try to confirm the existence of water on Mars.

That was at the rovers' arrival in January, 2004.

Their initial mission to look for signs of water on Mars completed within the 90 day time frame, both rovers were still going strong. So, officially living on borrowed time, NASA scientists decided to try and get as much out of the rovers as possible before they too went the way of

Pathfinder/SojournerViking, and all the other Mars missions.


Needless to say, the rovers did not disappoint.



The mission started running into trouble in 2009, which is when Spirit got stuck. All attempts to free the rover failed and the mission was altered to be one of a stationary science platform. Unfortunately for Spirit, it was poorly positioned to harness solar energy in order to recharge its batteries during the coming Martian winter. The last communication with Spirit came on March 22, 2010 and the mission was declared over the following year.



While its twin was going through its final days, Opportunity kept right on going, redefining our collective knowledge of the Red Planet as it went.



Speaking on Opportunity's unimaginable longevity at the mission's 10th anniversary, John Callas, project manager for Opportunity at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), said that “these are magnificently designed machines . . . we really have greatly expanded the exploration envelope by having a vehicle that can not only last so long but stay in very good health over that time, such that we can continue exploring."



All told, Opportunity would travel over 28 miles non Mars, breaking the interplanetary vehicular travel distance long-held by the Soviet Union's Lunokhod 2 (1973). Through all of this, aside from some software memory issues (which NASA was able to bypass), the rover remained in remarkably good 'health.'



Then came the dust storm of 2018.



In the beginning of June, a local dust storm began, which in and of itself was not a cause for worry. However, within a few days, the storm picked up intensity and eventually enveloped the entire planet. Opportunity was a solar powered rover and depended on the sunlight to recharge its batteries on a daily basis. With the dust storm persisting, the rover began to lose its ability to harness sunlight. The last transmission from the rover came on June 10, at which point it entered hibernation mode.



NASA made its first attempts to contact the rover in October, after the storm subsided. There was no reply and fear was mounting that the rover had either suffered a catastrophic failure or that its solar panels were buried under a think blanket of dust. A last ray of hope was the tendency for the Martian winds to pick up around the end of 2018 and into 2019. These seasonal windy periods had cleaned the rover's solar panels in years past but, come this trip around the Sun, they never materialized.



With hopes fading, NASA made one last attempt to contact the rover on February 12, 2019. When no reply came, NASA beamed its last transmission to the rover: the classic Billie Holiday song “I'll be Seeing You.”



The mission was declared over the following day.





Remember when . . .


Now, as space enthusiasts remember the rover, it's still hard to comprehend that the mission lasted for 15 years. For a trip down memory lane, consider the following . . .



The majority of today's high school freshman class was born in 2004



At the start of 2004, Facebook. Gmail, Skype, Yelp and Firefox didn't exist



SpaceShipOne becomes the world's first private spacecraft



A 42” plasma TV costs $4,000



The majority of digital cameras are 3MP in resolution



The world's first 1MP camera phone debuts



HDTV, DVR, satellite radio and Bluetooth are in their infancy



'Blogging' named new word of the year



iPods are all the rage



Drones are first used in the military



PC maker Gateway closes all its retail stores and IBM sells out to Lenovo



Electronic voting machines make their first appearance in the United States



The hacking group Anonymous is formed


Like What You Just Read?

Why not check out other great stuff about photography, astronomy, associated gear, and how to use it.

Think someone else would find this informative (or at least entertaining)? Use the buttons below to share!