Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Fuji Announces X-Pro1, X100 Big Brother. Price Set, Release Date TBA

The Fuji X-Pro1: the lenses come off!

There's some really hot stuff coming out of CES 2012. First the Nikon D4 and now the Fujifilm X-Pro1, the interchangeable lens big brother of the immensely popular X100 large sensor P&S. Read all about it here.

Ok, here are some key specs:

Body: metal, no sealing
Sensor: 16Mp APS-C CMOS
Orientation sensor: Yes
Aspect ratios: 1:1, 3:2, 16:9
Formats: RAW, JPEG
ISO: 200-25,600
Modes: Program, Time value, Aperture value, manual
AF: Contrast detect
AF assist lamp: Yes
Viewfinder: 100% coverage, optical/digital hybrid
LCD: 3” 1,230,000 dot live view, fixed
Shutter Speed: 1/4000-30 seconds
Flash Sync: 1/180th second
Continuous drive: 6fps max
Exposure Compensation: +/- 2 stops
AE Bracketing: (1/3, 2/3, 1stop values)
WB Bracketing: No
Built-in flash: No
Video: 1080p full HD
Microphone: stereo
Speaker: stereo
Movie Formats: H.264
Storage: SD, SDHC, SDXC
HDMI: Yes
GPS: No
Weight: 15.9ozs. (with battery)
Size: 5.5” x 2.2” x 1.7”
Price: Around $1,700
Availability: TBA

Want one? Well, considering that the X100 was just about impossible to find for almost a year after it first hit stores, I suggest that you preorder your X-Pro1 today before the 'line' gets too long!


Humble requests:
If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Nikon D4 vs. Canon 1Dx, Examiner for Weeks of 12/25, 1/1

The Nikon D4 is the big photographic news event of now.

First of all, I did a write-up on my Examiner column on the whole Nikon D4 vs. Canon 1Dx debate. Which is better? Why not see for yourself?

NOTE: the Examiner lists may seem thin, but this is because I'm not including links to timely news items, like solar storms, and other 1-day events. The more evergreen stuff is staying.



Space News
Comet Lovejoy from Space
ASU to look for alien artifacts on Moon
Amateurs photograph Phobos-Grunt
Science vs. 2012
Astrology: why people still believe
President Obama has gone to Mars!
Stephen Hawking: women are the universe's biggest mystery
Stephen Hawking defies ALS, turns 70



National Photography
Caught on camera: the birth of an island
New software tracks lost cameras
Stars we lost in 2011
2012: Doomsday for digital cameras?
In photos: Quadrantid Meteors
Video: marriage proposal goes horribly wrong
Nikon announces the D4
Nikon D4: a $6000 yawn


Cleveland Astronomy
Featured sight for week of 12/25: latest sunrises
Comet Lovejoy from space
Get Sirius: ring in the New Year with the Dog Star
NASA takes on 2012
President Obama has gone to Mars!
Happy perihelion
The January Sky



Cleveland Photography
The nightmare after Christmas: unwanted gifts
The horizontally-moving Sun
Screaming of a White Christmas!
What will 2012 mean for digital cameras?
2011 predictions revisited
Meteor photos online
Fuji announces a slew of new cameras
Nikon announces the D4
The Nikon D4: a $6000 disappointment



Humble requests:
If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Nikon D4 vs. D3/D3s: Should I Buy One or Wait for the D5?

The D4 is quite a camera, but it's not revolutionary like the D3.


Yesterday, Nikon announced its D4 dSLR, which the company labeled as 'multi-media' thanks to its much enhanced video capability. So, now that the 4 ½ year-old D3 is finally has a replacement (the D3s was a D3 with video), is the D4 a camera worth buying?

When looking at the spec sheet of the D4, one immediately notices one thing:
a lot has not changed 
from the D3s.

UPDATE: See how the D4 stacks up against the Canon 1Dx

Now, what does this mean for Nikon?

Answer: the battle for the 4
th
generation of pro digital cameras will come down to the high-resolution models that both Nikon and Canon have yet to launch.

When the Nikon D3 came out in fall, 2007, it completely blew away the Canon 1D Mark III in itself. Then, factor in the AF problems found on the Canon and the stupid 1.3x crop factor and, in one stroke, Nikon had, for the first time in 2 decades, a body that the pros really wanted. Want proof? Look at the photographer areas at sporting events. Before the D3, there used to be mostly white Canon glass. Now? There's a healthy mix of white Canons and black Nikkors. When Canon launched the 1D Mark IV in 2009, the, at the time, 2-year old D3 was still, in the eyes of many, overwhelmingly superior thanks to its larger sensor and better low-light performance. Then, throw in the just-announced D3s (a D3 with even higher ISO and video) and, guess what, Canon looked pretty antiquated.

Then came October, 2011 and
the Canon 1Dx, a high-speed, FF pro model designed to go head-to-head with Nikon's aging D3 line. On paper, the Canon 1Dx was extremely formidable, being the first do it all Canon camera as it combined high resolution (18Mp), the ability to shoot high speed (12fps), and full HD video capabilities (something the band-aid D3s couldn't do). Now, with the first real competition in years, Nikon had to pull out all the stops to keep its place in the Sun.

And what did they deliver? Yesterday's lunch (a D3/D3s) warmed over.

In the end, the debate of whether one should buy a D4 comes down to one simple question: how important is video? If video makes up a substantial part of your camera usage,  preorder a D4 right now before the “line” gets too long. If you are mainly a still shooter the D3/D3s is still a formidable camera that should allow you to happily keep clicking away until the D5 comes out, probably sometime in 2015.

As for who's king of the hill right now, it's hard to say. Both Nikon and Canon have pretty much equal high speed pro cameras (D4 and 1Dx) and an aging stable of other high-end cameras, most notably the big Mp flagship models (D3x and 1Ds Mark III). Also of note are the ancient (in digital terms) Nikon D700 and Canon 5D Mark II, both 2008 releases though hardly direct competitors. Going older, both Nikon and Canon are still listing the D300s (Nikon) and 50D (Canon) on their websites, despite both being essentially made obsolete by 'lesser,' cheaper models (D7000 and 60D, respectively).

Needless to say, it will be interesting to see what both companies pull out of their sleeves in the coming months, especially now that both have put their cards on the table in the high speed pro market segment.


Humble requests:
If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.

Friday, January 6, 2012

Nikon Announces the D4 'Multi-Media' dSLR, 85 f1.8 AF-S

The Nikon D4 with the new 85 f1.8 AF-S.

Nikon has just announced the long-awaited successor to the D3/D3s models: the D4, which Nikon claims to be a true multi-media camera thanks to its greatly enhanced video capabilities. In digital camera terms, the D3/D3s was getting quite old for a dSLR. Launched in 2007, the D3 revolutionized photography and, for Nikon, was a much needed shot in the arm as, for the first time since the AF revolution in the 80s, pros had a legitimate reason to see the Nikon system as equal to or better than long-reigning King Canon.

Building on the success of the D3, Nikon has offered improvements in many categories that are sure to make many current Nikonians consider an update and some non-Nikonians consider jumping ship.

Key specs:Body: magnesium alloy, weather seals
Sensor: 16Mp FX
Aspect ratios: 3:2, 5:4
Formats: NEF (RAW), TIFF, JPEG
ISO: 50-204,800
AF Modes: 7
AF Points: 51
Viewfinder: 100% coverage. 0.7x magnification
LCD: 3.2” 920k dot live view
Shutter Speed: 1/8000-30 seconds, bulb
Flash Sync: 1/250th second
Exposure Compensation: +/- 5 stops
Video: 1080p full HD
Movie Formats: MPEG, H.264
Storage: Compactflash, XQD
Weight: 2.95lbs (with battery)
Size: 6.3” x 6.2” x 3.6”
Price: $5999.95


Oh, yes, Nikon updated its 85 f1.8 lens to AF-S, too.

In the following couple of days, expect some commentary, especially in light of the Canon 1Dx, to come, too. For now, if you want some in-depth analysis, go here.


Humble requests:
If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Happy Perihelion!

The Sun: it's at its closest right now.


Believe it or not, Earth is at a point in its orbit called perihelion or, in everyday language, the point in its orbit where it is closest from the Sun (okay, perihelion was 2 days ago, but it's close enough!). For many people who erroneously believe that the seasons are caused by the earth's distance to the Sun, this fact disproves this common misconception (at least for people living in the Northern Hemisphere) as January is often the coldest month despite the Earth being at its closest distance from the Sun.
So, for people not familiar with the solar system, this fact leaves 2 big questions: how can Earth be at different distances from the Sun in a circular orbit and what causes the seasons? First, let's tackle the question about distance to the Sun.
First of all, the planets' orbits are not circular at all, but elliptical. In geometry, an ellipse is a slightly elongated circle. Since the time of the Ancient Greeks, it was commonly assumed that the planets had to be in perfect, circular orbits. Unfortunately, a observing techniques were refined, it became obvious that the planets weren't exactly where they were supposed to be. However, it was not until Johannes Kepler in the early 1600s that it was realized that the planets do not orbit in circles, but in slightly elongated ellipses, hence why the Earth can be different distances from the Sun.
Now, onto the seasons, if not for Earth's distance to the Sun, why do we have them?. Answer: it's all about Earth's tilt.
If the Earth were spinning on its axis with no tilt at all, everyone would be treated to days of identical length every day of the year, with latitudes nearer the equator having longer days than those nearer the poles. However, with the tilt, the angle of the Earth relative to the Sun changes as or planet moves about its orbit. On the Winter Solstice (shortest day of the year) the Northern Hemisphere is tilted up and away from the Sun. On the Summer Solstice (longest day of the year), the Northern Hemisphere will be tilted down toward the Sun. On the equinoxes, the tilt is half way between the solstices. To see this effect, go out and observe the path the Sun takes through the sky for the course of day of winter.
As seen on the Summer Solstice from the Cleveland area (where I'm from), the Sun rises in the Northeast, arcs into the Southern sky, peaking at a height of about 72 degrees at local noon (about 1:30pm), and then starts heading down to its set in the Northwest. On the solstice, the day will be over 15 hours long. Now, for people living at different latitudes, your numbers may differ with more Northerly dwellers seeing more extreme changes. For about a month after the solstice, you will notice that the rise/set points of the Sun hardly change, hence “solstice” from the Latin words “sol” and “sitre,” literally, “Sun stands still.”
By early August though, the days start to shorten and the Sun is noticeably moving South, towards due West at sunset. The shortening of the days will accelerate until the Sun reaches the day of the Autumnal Equinox, where it will rise/set exactly due East/West. At this point, both day and night will be exactly 12 hours long. The Sun will never leave the Southern celestial hemisphere until the next Vernal Equinox (first day of spring).
The shortening of the days will continue until the Sun finally reaches its most Southerly rise/set on the Winter Solstice, the shortest day of the year. On this day, the Sun will rise/set low in the Southeast, get only about 25 degrees high at local noon (in my location at about 12:30 thanks to a return to Standard Time). The final result: a day that is only 9 hours long.
Now, by looking at these statistics, namely where the Sun rises, how high it climbs, and how long the days is, it is obvious to see that the angle of the Sun relative to Earth, not its distance, determines why we have seasons.

Humble requests:
If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

It's Official: 2011 Was the Worst Year for Astronomy in Recorded History


Rain can be fun to photograph mid-fall, but is's all-around bad news for astronomers!

For anyone who lives in Northeast Ohio's Cleveland area and who likes to look up at the night sky, there was no doubt about it: 2011 was one of the cloudiest years ever. Personally, ever since really getting into astronomy back in 2004, this was the worst year I can remember. Honestly, it seemed like there was nothing but wall-to-wall clouds for the first 6 months of the year (except when the Moon was near Full, of course!). Finally, come July, things cleared out in a big way, finally bringing the first multi-day runs of clear nights for the entire year. With the middle of August, you guessed it, the clouds were back, which is where they have stayed for the most part.

Well, according to the national Weather Service, 2011 was Northeast Ohio's worst season for astronomy as it was not only the wettest year on record, but the wettest by a wide margin since records began being kept in in the early 1870s. For Cleveland, we ended the year with over 65 inches of precipitation in 2011, more than 26 inches above the average. The old record from 1990? It's toast, being beaten by over a foot this year.

Here's hoping for a drier, and clearer, 2012!


Humble requests:
If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Happy New Year, and Many More to Come!



Well, it's official: 2011 is gone and 2012 is here which, for many people, only means one thing: there's less than a year to live. While prophets of doom are nothing new, the 2012 Maya calendar running out hype is something that has been building for quite some time and will only continue to increase in the forefront of many individuals' minds until December 22 arrives after nothing happens on the day before. In short, more so than at any time since the big lead-up to Y2K over a decade (has it been that long already?) ago, 2012 will be a year of crackpots and crazy ideas that will make full fledged, frontal assaults on reason for almost all year long.

Now, anyone who has been visiting here for any length of time will have inferred by now that I am a big proponent of logic, skepticism, and the scientific method, three things that will be immensely useful in the coming 12 months as end of the world predictions become more frequent and, in all probability, more imaginative. The bottom line is this: never in the history of man has any prophecy ever come true, a lesson that preacher Harold Camping has learned twice in 2011 alone. When reading prophetic works, one cannot help but notice how vague such 'predictions' are, which is why they are only fulfilled in hindsight when we can take events of the present and make them fit with a prophecy of the past. Needless to say, the prophets have a pretty poor track record, one that shouldn't inspire any sort of confidence when it comes to predictions for December 21, 2012.

Now, in anticipation of the big day when nothing is going to happen, I've placed a December 21 countdown clock at the top of the right menu bar as the one at the top of this posting is soon to get buried as more content is added.
So, being that it is 2012, be sure to keep your common sense about you, take a scientific approach to any outlandish ideas, and educate your fellow man about the reality of 2012.


For more info:
List of failed Doomsdays



Humble requests:

If you found this informative (or at least entertaining), help me pay my bills and check out my Examiner pages for space news, cleveland photography, national photography, and astronomy for more great stuff.

If you think this was cool, why not tell a friend?

For something even better, follow this blog.